Commentary for Bava Kamma 62:7
לעולם כדאמר מעיקרא ודקשיא לך כולן חייבין תרגמה רב אדא בר מניומי קמיה דרבינא שהוזקו כלים בכלים
But according to Rab who maintains that it is only where the nuisance has been abandoned that this is so, whereas if not [abandoned] it is not so,<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' But is subject to the law applicable to Ox where damage to inanimate objects is also compensated. ');"><sup>12</sup></span> what reason could be advanced?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' For the person of the second, though lying on the ground, has surely never been abandoned by him. Why then exemption for damage done by him to inanimate objects? ');"><sup>13</sup></span>
Explore commentary for Bava Kamma 62:7. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.